SecurAcath compares very favorably to sutures and adhesive devices in terms of the performance attributes that matter most to clinicians.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/562c3/562c311d94cbbda1a09b87959726984e646c41fa" alt="table"
SecurAcath vs. Sutures
SecurAcath vs. Statlock – Securement
SecurAcath vs. Statlock – Dressing Change
SecurAcath vs. Adhesive Device – Pistoning During Cleaning
SecurAcath Cost Effectiveness Analysis
Adhesive Devices
SecurAcath is more cost effective than adhesive devices because SecurAcath:
- Does not need to be replaced
- Remains continuously secure
- Minimizes migration and dislodgement
VS
Sutures
SecurAcath is more cost effective than sutures because SecurAcath:
- Saves time
- Eliminates needlestick injury risk
- Improves efficiency
- Decreases catheter maintenance costs